何倩, 吴骋, 张新佶, 赵艳芳, 许金芳, 王睿, 郭晓晶, 贺佳. 不同层次医学生统计软件学习效果影响因素分析[J]. 上海预防医学, 2019, 31(8): 644-647. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2019.18945
引用本文: 何倩, 吴骋, 张新佶, 赵艳芳, 许金芳, 王睿, 郭晓晶, 贺佳. 不同层次医学生统计软件学习效果影响因素分析[J]. 上海预防医学, 2019, 31(8): 644-647. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2019.18945
HE Qian, ZHANG Xin-ji, ZHANG Xin-ji, ZHAO Yan-fang, XU Jin-fang, WANG Rui, GUO Xiao-jing, HE Jia. Influencing factors on learning effects of statistical software for medical students at different levels[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2019, 31(8): 644-647. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2019.18945
Citation: HE Qian, ZHANG Xin-ji, ZHANG Xin-ji, ZHAO Yan-fang, XU Jin-fang, WANG Rui, GUO Xiao-jing, HE Jia. Influencing factors on learning effects of statistical software for medical students at different levels[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2019, 31(8): 644-647. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2019.18945

不同层次医学生统计软件学习效果影响因素分析

Influencing factors on learning effects of statistical software for medical students at different levels

  • 摘要:
    目的了解不同层次医学生统计分析软件学习情况和教学影响因素,为提高教学效果提供理论依据。
    方法自行设计问卷,对某高校医学本科生和研究生进行问卷调查,调查对医学统计软件课程的认知、态度和行为,以及影响教学效果的影响因素。用SAS 9.4统计软件进行统计描述和分析。
    结果本科生和研究生在对医学统计学软件学习均表示有难度,但更多的研究生表示兴趣浓,更多的本科生认为会对以后学习帮助大。本科生喜欢先复习再做作业,研究生则偏向边看资料边完成作业。研究生和本科生均认为影响学生学习效果的主要原因有:课程自身特点、课程安排、学生的行为、教师授课情况、学生的学习态度;仅在“是否需要课下做练习”方面存在差异。
    结论需要针对影响因素提出提高教学效果的对策:充分发挥教师主导作用,教学方式多样化,给本科生适当地增加真实世界的非典型案例,端正学生对医学统计学的认识和态度,增加学生的兴趣和学习动机。

     

    Abstract:
    ObjectiveTo ascertain the learning status and influencing factors for medical statistical software among medical undergraduate and graduates and to provide a theoretical basis for improving teaching effect.
    MethodsWith an individually designed questionnaire, including cognition, attitude and behaviors about medical statistics software course, an investigation was carried out on medical undergraduates and graduates.Then statistical analysis was conducted with SAS 9.4 statistical software.
    ResultsUndergraduates and postgraduates both thought it was difficult to learn medical statistical software course.Postgraduates had more interests in it while undergraduates thought it was more helpful.Undergraduates liked to review before doing home work and postgraduates tended to read the material while completing their homework.Both undergraduates and postgraduates held that the primary influencing factors were the characteristics of curriculum itself, course arrangement, students′ behaviors, teachers′ teaching style and students learning attitude; the only difference between them was "whether there was the need to do homework after class".
    ConclusionIt is necessary to propose strategy for improvement on the teaching effect, such as giving full play to the leading role of teachers, diversifying teaching styles, offering atypical cases in the world for undergraduates, correcting students′ understanding and attitude towards medical statistics, and increasing the interests and motivation of undergraduates.

     

/

返回文章
返回