苏浙皖40个城市公共健康治理能力的系统评价

A systematic evaluation of the public health governance capacity of 40 cities in JiangsuZhejiangand Anhui Provinces

  • 摘要:
    目的 系统评价我国苏浙皖地区40个城市的公共健康治理能力,为打造“健康长三角”提供科学评价依据。
    方法 系统收集苏浙皖地区与公共健康治理能力相关的政策文件、公开信息报告和研究文献等,共收集6 920份政策文件、1 720份信息报告、1 200篇文献。依据课题组前期构建的适宜公共健康体系评价标准,评估其公共健康治理能力的基本状况,明确优势与短板。
    结果 2022年苏浙皖地区40个城市的公共健康治理能力评分为(562.5±38.0)分;从不同领域看,应急突发领域评分最高(791.4±49.7)分,慢性病防治领域最低(368.2±29.6)分。苏浙皖地区目前健康优先的战略基本实现、公共健康法律规制逐渐完善、组织架构基本形成体系、信息数据底座建设扎实,但政府公共卫生财政投入不稳定、部门职责分工不明确、信息的互联互通受阻等短板仍需弥补。
    结论 苏浙皖地区40个城市的公共健康治理能力处于中等水平,但不同区域和领域间仍有差距,未来在继续巩固发展既有优势的基础上,应针对问题找准原因,建立长期稳定的公共健康财政投入机制、信息的互联互通机制,进一步明确部门职责,推动“健康长三角”目标的达成。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To systematically evaluate the public health governance capacity of 40 cities in Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Anhui Provinces, providing a scientific evaluation basis for building a "Healthy Yangtze River Delta".
    Methods A comprehensive collection of policy documents, public information reports, and research literature related to public health governance capacity in Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Anhui Provinces was conducted, totaling 6 920 policy documents, 1 720 information reports, and 1 200 literature pieces. Based on the evaluation standards for an appropriate public health system established by the research team, the basic status of public health governance capacity was assessed to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the 40 cities.
    Results In 2022, the public health governance capacity score for the 40 cities in Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Anhui Provinces was (562.5±38.0) points. In terms of specific areas, the emergency response field received the highest score of (791.4±49.7) points, while the chronic disease prevention and control field received the lowest score of (368.2±29.6) points. The Jiangsu-Zhejiang-Anhui region has largely achieved the strategic priority of health, gradually improved public health legal regulations, and established a basic organizational framework with a solid foundation for information and data infrastructure. However, challenges still need to be addressed, such as unstable government funding for public health, unclear departmental responsibilities, and barriers to information interoperability.
    Conclusion The public health governance capacity of the 40 cities in Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Anhui Province has been at a moderate level, but disparities have still existed across regions and fields. In the future, while continuing to deepen existing advantages, it is essential to accurately identify the causes of problems, establish a long-term and stable investment mechanism, enhance information connectivity mechanisms, further clarify departmental responsibilities, and promote the achievement of the "Healthy Yangtze River Delta" goal.

     

/

返回文章
返回