2023年北京市东城区不同生境中蚊虫生态位及种间关系

Ecological niche and interspecific relationship of mosquitoes in different habitats in Dongcheng DistrictBeijing2023

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨北京市东城区不同生境中蚊虫生态位特征及种间关系,为蚊虫生态学监测、防制及相关蚊媒传染病防控策略的制定或优化提供依据。
    方法 2023年5—10月,采用二氧化碳(CO2)诱蚊灯法对北京市东城区的居民区、公园绿地、旅游景点和医疗机构进行生态学监测,采用Levins生态位宽度指数、Pinaka生态位重叠度指数和生态位相似系数分析不同生境中蚊虫的生态位特征与种间关系。
    结果 北京市东城区不同生境中淡色库蚊时间生态位宽度(10.62)高于白纹伊蚊(8.29),2种蚊虫的时间生态位重叠指数高达0.87。淡色库蚊在不同监测生境类型中的空间生态位宽度均高于白纹伊蚊。淡色库蚊在不同监测生境中的生态位宽度顺序从高到低依次为居民区(11.09)>旅游景点(10.25)>医疗机构(9.15)>公园绿地(9.07),而白纹伊蚊在不同监测生境中的生态位宽度顺序从高到低依次为居民区(8.56)>医疗机构(7.68)>公园绿地(7.44)>旅游景点(5.73);空间生态位重叠情况显示,淡色库蚊与白纹伊蚊在居民区环境中的重叠指数最大(0.86),在其余生境中的重叠指数依次为公园绿地(0.81)>医疗机构(0.68)>旅游景点(0.60);生态位相似系数进一步验证显示,两蚊种的相似系数在居民区最高(0.712),在旅游景点最低(0.497),在公园绿地和医疗机构的相似系数介于两者之间,分别为0.675和0.598。
    结论 北京市东城区不同生境中,淡色库蚊对时空资源利用能力强于白纹伊蚊,两者在居民区的时空资源利用模式更为相似,可针对不同生境类型中2种蚊虫的生态位特征和种间关系制定相应的防制策略,提高防制效果。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the characteristics of ecological niche and interspecific relationships of mosquitoes in different habitats in Dongcheng District, Beijing, and to provide a basis for mosquito ecological monitoring, control and the development or optimization of prevention and control strategies for related mosquito-borne diseases.
    Methods From May to October 2023, the ecological monitoring in residential areas, parks, tourist attractions and medical institutions in Dongcheng District of Beijing was carried out using the carbon dioxide (CO2) mosquito trapping method, and the ecological niche characteristics and interspecific relationships of mosquitoes in different habitats were analyzed using Levins ecological niche breadth index, Pinaka ecological niche overlap index and ecological niche similarity coefficients.
    Results The temporal ecological niche of Culex pipienspallens (10.62) was higher than that of Aedes albopictus (8.29) in different habitats in Dongcheng District of Beijing, and the temporal ecological niche overlap index of the two mosquitoes was as high as 0.87. The ecological niche breadth of Culex pipienspallens was higher than that of Aedes albopictus in different monitoring habitats, and the order of the ecological niche breadth of Culex pipienspallens in different monitoring habitats was, from high to low, as follows: residential areas (11.09) > tourist attractions (10.25) > medical institutions (9.15) > parks (9.07), while the ecological niche breadth of Aedes albopictus in different habitats was, in descending order, residential areas (8.56) > medical institutions (7.68) > parks (7.44) > tourist attractions (5.73). The results of niche overlap analysis showed that the overlap index between Culex pipienspallens and Aedes albopictus was the largest in residential areas (0.86), as for in other habitats, which was, in descending order, parks (0.81) > medical institutions (0.68) > tourist attractions (0.60). Besides, the ecological similarity coefficients further verified that similarity coefficients, between the two mosquito species, were highest in residential areas (0.712), lowest in tourist attractions (0.497), and which were 0.675 in parks and 0.598 in medical institutions, respectively.
    Conclusion In different monitoring habitats in Dongcheng District of Beijing, Culex albopictus pallens demonstrates a stronger spatio-temporal resource utilization ability than Aedes albopictus, and the two species exhibit more similar spatio-temporal resource utilization patterns in residential areas. Corresponding control strategies targeting the characteristics of ecological niches and interspecific relationships of these two mosquito species in different habitats should be developed to enhance the prevention and control effect.

     

/

返回文章
返回