诱蚊诱卵器法与人诱停落法在伊蚊监测中的效果比较

王力; 张文革

doi:10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2019.19531

诱蚊诱卵器法与人诱停落法在伊蚊监测中的效果比较

王力,
张文革

Comparison between mosq-ovitrap and human landing catch in monitoring Aedes albopictus L.

摘要

摘要:
目的比较诱蚊诱卵器法与人诱停落法在同一环境伊蚊监测结果的一致性。
方法5—10月每月中旬选择上海市崇明区4个乡镇，采用诱蚊诱卵器法监测一次，于布放诱蚊诱卵器的第4天(回收诱蚊诱卵器当日)及布放诱蚊诱卵器的第14天分别进行一次人诱停落法监测。
结果经Pearson相关分析，诱蚊诱卵指数(MOI)和停落指数(布放诱蚊诱卵器第4天)相关性具有统计学意义，相关系数为0.908(P＜0.05)；MOI和停落指数(布放诱蚊诱卵器第14天)的相关性也具有统计学意义，相关系数为0.981(P＜0.05)。
结论在白纹伊蚊密度较低的情况下，诱蚊诱卵器法与人诱停落法有较好的相互替代性，可根据具体情况选择使用。诱蚊诱卵器法可以反映白纹伊蚊成蚊的密度，这种反映可对应监测当日和监测后10天。

Abstract:
ObjectiveTo compare the consistency between the results of mosq-ovitrap and human landing catch in the same environment for Aedes albopictus L.(A.albopictus) mosquitoes surveillance.
MethodsIn every mid-month from May to October in 2018, the density of A.albopictus in 4 villages of Chongming, Shanghai was investigated by mosq-ovitrap.Human landing catch was used to monitor the density on the fourth day of laying Mosq-ovitrap (the day of recovering mosq-ovitrap) and on the fourteenth day of laying Mosq-ovitrap.
ResultsBy pearson correlation analysis, correlation coefficient of Mosq-ovitrap Index and human landing catch index (The fourth day of laying Mosq-ovitrap) was 0.908(P < 0.05); correlation coefficient of Mosq-ovitrap Index and human landing catch index (the fourteenth day of laying Mosq-ovitrap) was 0.981(P < 0.05).
ConclusionThe Mosq-ovitrap can replace the human landing catch during the low density of A.albopictus.The mosquito trap method can reflect the density of A.albopictus mosquitoes on the day of monitoring and 10 days after.

HTML全文

参考文献(7)

施引文献

资源附件(0)