刘湾湾, 黄勤瑾, 蒋泓, 钱序. 妇女孕前健康素养评价问卷的信效度研究[J]. 上海预防医学, 2018, 30(11): 892-898. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2018.18960
引用本文: 刘湾湾, 黄勤瑾, 蒋泓, 钱序. 妇女孕前健康素养评价问卷的信效度研究[J]. 上海预防医学, 2018, 30(11): 892-898. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2018.18960
LIU Wan-wan, HUANG Qin-jin, JIANG Hong, QIAN Xu. Reliability and validity of the health literacy assessment questionnaire related to pre-pregnancy[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2018, 30(11): 892-898. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2018.18960
Citation: LIU Wan-wan, HUANG Qin-jin, JIANG Hong, QIAN Xu. Reliability and validity of the health literacy assessment questionnaire related to pre-pregnancy[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2018, 30(11): 892-898. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2018.18960

妇女孕前健康素养评价问卷的信效度研究

Reliability and validity of the health literacy assessment questionnaire related to pre-pregnancy

  • 摘要:
    目的研究妇女孕前健康素养评价问卷的信度和效度,为相关人群孕前健康素养的评价提供科学的测量工具。
    方法通过得分率和临界比值法分别评价各题目的难度和区分度;通过同质性检验、分半信度和重测信度评价问卷的信度;通过专家评价法、相关分析和验证性因子分析评价问卷的效度。
    结果该问卷各题目均具有良好的区分度。总问卷、卫生服务、疾病预防和健康促进维度的Cronbach′s α分别是0.864、0.723、0.694和0.704。分半信度是0.899,重测信度系数是0.808。问卷题目的代表性较好,各题目得分与总分的相关系数是0.295~0.759(P < 0.01),说明该问卷内容效度良好。验证性因子分析结果显示,χ2/df、估计误差均方根(RMSEA)、均方根残差(RMR)、拟合优度指数(GFI)和调整拟合优度指数(AGFI)在医疗服务模型分别是3.134、0.064、0.073、0.958和0.928;在疾病预防模型是2.686、0.057、0.060、0.981和0.954;健康促进模型是0.858、0.000、0.013、0.997和0.988。
    结论该研究所获得的孕前健康素养评价问卷具有良好的信度和效度。

     

    Abstract:
    ObjectiveTo evaluate the reliability and validity of the health literacy assessment questionnaire done prior to pregnancy and provide scientific measurement for assessment of health literacy in related population.
    MethodsThe scoring rate and the critical ratio method were used to evaluate the degrees of difficulty and differentiation with each item.The internal consistency Cronbach′s α coefficient, split-half reliability and test-retest reliability were conducted to measure the reliability with the questions.The content validity and confirmatory factor analysis were used to test the validity.
    ResultsEach question of the questionnaire was proved to have a good differentiation degree.The Cronbach′s α of general health literacy, healthcare literacy, disease prevention literacy and health promotion literacy were 0.864, 0.723, 0.694 and 0.704 respectively.The split-half reliability was 0.899.The test-retest reliability was 0.808.The experts thought each question had a good representativeness and the correlation coefficient between the scores of each question and the total score were 0.295~0.759 (P < 0.01), indicating that the content validity was good.The results of the confirmatory factor analysis showed that for the indicators of χ2/df, RMSEA, RMR, GFI and AGFI, in the Healthcare Literacy model, they were 3.134, 0.064, 0.073, 0.958 and 0.928 respectively; in Disease Prevention Literacy model, they were 2.686, 0.057, 0.060, 0.981 and 0.954 respectively; in Health Promotion Literacy model, they were 0.858, 0.000, 0.013, 0.997 and 0.988 respectively.
    ConclusionThe health literacy assessment questionnaire done prior to pregnancy has acceptable validity and reliability.

     

/

返回文章
返回