陈佳婧, 孙晓冬, 黄卓英, 刘捷宸. 现场调查和信息系统抽查的免疫规划疫苗接种率的比较[J]. 上海预防医学, 2020, 32(8): 609-613. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2020.19982
引用本文: 陈佳婧, 孙晓冬, 黄卓英, 刘捷宸. 现场调查和信息系统抽查的免疫规划疫苗接种率的比较[J]. 上海预防医学, 2020, 32(8): 609-613. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2020.19982
CHEN Jia-jing, SUN Xiao-dong, HUANG Zhuo-ying, LIU Jie-chen. Immunization program vaccination rates compared between field investigation and information system sample survey[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2020, 32(8): 609-613. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2020.19982
Citation: CHEN Jia-jing, SUN Xiao-dong, HUANG Zhuo-ying, LIU Jie-chen. Immunization program vaccination rates compared between field investigation and information system sample survey[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2020, 32(8): 609-613. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2020.19982

现场调查和信息系统抽查的免疫规划疫苗接种率的比较

Immunization program vaccination rates compared between field investigation and information system sample survey

  • 摘要:
    目的比较上海市现场调查和免疫规划信息系统抽查的适龄儿童免疫规划疫苗接种率的统计结果, 验证依托信息系统评估接种率的可行性。
    方法分层随机抽取上海市的3个区, 采取容量比例概率抽样法抽取634名0~6岁儿童进行现场调查; 另随机抽取630名0~6岁儿童进行信息系统抽查.对被查儿童的免疫规划疫苗接种率进行统计和比较分析。
    结果现场调查和信息系统抽查儿童的年龄构成和户籍构成的差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。现场调查的国家免疫规划疫苗接种率为99.91%, 及时接种率为94.29%;信息系统抽查的国家免疫规划疫苗接种率为97.49%, 及时接种率为87.90%。调查的所有26剂免疫规划疫苗在信息系统抽查的接种率和及时接种率均低于现场调查的结果。18剂疫苗在信息系统抽查的接种率与现场调查的结果差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05), 20剂疫苗的及时接种率结果差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
    结论现场调查和信息系统抽查免疫规划疫苗接种率各有利弊, 建议今后采用两者相结合的方式开展接种率评估。

     

    Abstract:
    ObjectiveTo assess the accuracy of immunization program vaccination rates through the immunization program information system by comparing immunization program vaccination rates among children between field investigation and information system sample survey in Shanghai.
    MethodsFrom three districts in Shanghai, samples were stratified and randomly selected.The PPS sampling method (probability proportional to size) was used for 634 children aged 0-6 years for field investigation and 630 children aged 0-6 years were randomly selected for information system sample survey.The immunization program vaccination rates of children surveyed were investigated, statistically analyzed and compared.
    ResultsStatistically significant differences (P < 0.05) were found in the age composition and household registration composition of children sampled by the field investigation and information system sample survey.The national immunization program vaccination rate was 99.91% and timely vaccination rate was 94.29% by the field investigation.The national immunization program vaccination rate was 97.49% and timely vaccination rate was 87.90% by the information system sample survey.All 26 doses of immunization program vaccine surveyed had lower rates of coverage and timely vaccination in the information system sample survey than in the field investigation.Eighteen doses of vaccination rates by information system sample survey data were statistically significantly (P < 0.05) lower than those by field investigation and 20 doses of timely vaccination rates by information system sample survey data were statistically significantly (P < 0.05) lower than those by field investigation.
    ConclusionThere are advantages and disadvantages to both field investigation and information system sample survey of immunization program vaccination rates.Field investigation and information system sample survey should be used in combination to evaluate the vaccination rate in future.

     

/

返回文章
返回