张丽娟, 王露, 张杰, 李觉. 临床医学专业学生流行病学课程线上线下混合式教学效果分析[J]. 上海预防医学, 2022, 34(11): 1153-1157. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2022.22238
引用本文: 张丽娟, 王露, 张杰, 李觉. 临床医学专业学生流行病学课程线上线下混合式教学效果分析[J]. 上海预防医学, 2022, 34(11): 1153-1157. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2022.22238
ZHANG Lijuan, WANG Lu, ZHANG Jie, LI Jue. Effect of blended teaching method in epidemiology teaching for students in clinical medicine[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2022, 34(11): 1153-1157. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2022.22238
Citation: ZHANG Lijuan, WANG Lu, ZHANG Jie, LI Jue. Effect of blended teaching method in epidemiology teaching for students in clinical medicine[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2022, 34(11): 1153-1157. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2022.22238

临床医学专业学生流行病学课程线上线下混合式教学效果分析

Effect of blended teaching method in epidemiology teaching for students in clinical medicine

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨临床医学专业学生流行病学线上线下混合式教学效果及满意度。
    方法 以同济大学医学院2021—2022第一学期进行线上线下混合式流行病学学习的143名临床医学专业学生为研究对象,对混合式课程的教学效果进行评价;通过问卷调查课程混合式教学模式学习的满意度。
    结果 课程综合测评的优良率为84.6%;有7.0%的学生期末试卷成绩不合格;21.0%的学生对于偏倚及控制等知识点掌握较差;90.2%的学生对混合式教学方式表示满意或非常满意。84.2%的学生表示对课程视频满意或非常满意;60.9%的学生在课前能通过视频学习完成75%以上的预习。80.5%的学生对通过课程混合式教学所掌握的知识点和理解表示满意,81.2%的学生认为课程混合式教学有利于个性化学习和知识面的拓展。
    结论 混合式教学虽然在流行病学教学中取得了明显成效,但仍有相当一部分学生存在对主要知识点掌握较差等情况,做好课程设计、加强教学效果和提高课程的接受度仍需深入研究。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To determine the effect of blended teaching method in epidemiology teaching for students in clinical medicine.
    Methods A total of 143 students in clinical medicine at Tongji University School of Medicine in the fall semester of 2021‒2022 were enrolled in the study. A self-assessment questionnaire was used to assess the satisfaction and recognition on the blended teaching method in epidemiology.
    Results In terms of teaching effect, 84.6% of the students obtained excellent and good grades in the final evaluation, while 7.0% of the students did not pass the final exam. Approximately 21.0% of the students had difficulties in understanding the concept of bias and its control. The 90.2% were satisfied with the design of the blended teaching method, 84.2% were satisfied with the online video courses, and 60.9% completed more than 75.0% of the online learning resources before class. Additionally, 80.5% of the students responded that they could master the knowledge of epidemiology, and 81.2% considered that the blended teaching method may facilitate personalized learning and they could learn more knowledge of epidemiology.
    Conclusion Blended teaching method attains remarkable achievements in epidemiology teaching. However, curriculum design, teaching effect, and acceptance may be further strengthened.

     

/

返回文章
返回