鲁柯柯, 何加芬, 付俊杰, 武昊, 何文鑫, 徐岷, 卢飞豹, 江文斌. 20162020年江西省城市饮用水微生物监测结果分析[J]. 上海预防医学, 2023, 35(3): 253-257. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2023.22428
引用本文: 鲁柯柯, 何加芬, 付俊杰, 武昊, 何文鑫, 徐岷, 卢飞豹, 江文斌. 20162020年江西省城市饮用水微生物监测结果分析[J]. 上海预防医学, 2023, 35(3): 253-257. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2023.22428
LU Keke, HE Jiafen, FU Junjie, WU Hao, HE Wenxin, XU Min, LU Feibao, JIANG Wenbin. Microbial monitoring of urban drinking water in Jiangxi Province from 2016 to 2020[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2023, 35(3): 253-257. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2023.22428
Citation: LU Keke, HE Jiafen, FU Junjie, WU Hao, HE Wenxin, XU Min, LU Feibao, JIANG Wenbin. Microbial monitoring of urban drinking water in Jiangxi Province from 2016 to 2020[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2023, 35(3): 253-257. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2023.22428

20162020年江西省城市饮用水微生物监测结果分析

Microbial monitoring of urban drinking water in Jiangxi Province from 2016 to 2020

  • 摘要:
    目的 对2016—2020年江西省城市饮用水微生物指标进行监测,分析微生物合格率变化情况,为政府有关部门决策提供科学依据。
    方法 监测2016—2020年江西省11个设区市和100个县(市、区)的城市生活饮用水微生物指标,按照GB/T 5750—2006《生活饮用水标准检验方法》和GB 5749—2006《生活饮用水卫生标准》分别进行水样采集、检测和卫生安全性评价。利用χ2检验对不同水期、水源类型、供水方式、水样类型、处理工艺、消毒方法等合格率进行比较。
    结果 2016—2020年江西省城市饮用水微生物监测10 584份,总体合格率为97.72%,合格率随年份逐渐上升(χ趋势2=87.789,P<0.001)。枯水期和丰水期微生物合格率分别为97.85%和97.60%,不同水期的监测水样的微生物指标合格率差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.718,P=0.398);不同水源类型的监测水样微生物指标合格率差异有统计学意义(χ2=79.560,P=0.398),地下水以98.83%的合格率高于地表水的97.70%;不同供水方式之间监测水样微生物合格率存在差异(χ2=201.836,P<0.001),市政集中式供水、自建设施集中式供水和二次供水的微生物合格率分别为97.51%、88.94%和96.56%;不同处理工艺之间监测水样微生物合格率存在差异(χ2=855.034,P<0.001),常规处理、沉淀过滤、仅消毒和未处理的水样微生物合格率分别为98.22%、67.19%、95.60%和53.13%;不同消毒方法的监测水样微生物指标合格率差异有统计学意义(χ2=904.993,P<0.001),氯化消毒、二氧化氯消毒、其他消毒方法和未消毒的水样微生物合格率分别为98.35%、98.19%、84.38%和60.16%。
    结论 江西省城市饮用水微生物合格率逐年上升,但仍有部分饮用水未采取相应的消毒剂及处理工艺,水质处理不到位,仍须加强对饮用水的净化、消毒和监测等。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To monitor the microbes in urban drinking water in Jiangxi from 2016 to 2020, to analyze the change in microbial qualification rate, and to provide a scientific basis for government decision-making.
    Methods According to the Standard Examination Method for Drinking Water (GB/T 5750‒2006) and the Standards for Drinking Water Quality (GB 5749‒2006), the water samples were collected, tested and evaluated for hygienic safety. The chi-square test was used to compare the qualification rates among different water periods, water source types, water supply modes, water samples, treatment processes, and disinfection methods.
    Results A total of 10 584 water samples were collected and examined from 2016 to 2020,with a qualification rate of 97.72%. The qualified rate of the microbiological index increased gradually over the years. There was no statistically significant difference in the microbiological qualification rate of water samples monitored in different water periods (χ2=0.718,P=0.398), and the qualification rates were 97.85% and 97.60% in dry and abundant water periods respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the qualification rates of water samples monitored in different water source types (χ2=79.560,P=0.398), with groundwater having a higher qualification rate of 98.83% than surface water (97.70%). The microbiological pass rate of water samples differed among different water supply methods (χ2=201.836,P<0.001). The microbiological pass rates of municipal centralized water supply, self-built centralized water supply and secondary water supply were 97.51%, 88.94% and 96.56% respectively. The microbiological pass rates of water samples differed among different treatment processes. There were differences in the qualification rates of the water samples between different treatment processes(χ2=855.034,P<0.001), with 98.22%, 67.19%, 95.60% and 53.13% of the conventionally treated, precipitated filtered, disinfected only and untreated water samples, respectively. The differences in the microbiological qualification rates of the monitored water samples between different disinfection methods were statistically significant (χ2=904.993,P<0.001). Chlorination disinfection, chlorine dioxide disinfection, other disinfection methods and non-disinfected water samples had the pass rates of 98.35%, 98.19%, 84.38% and 60.16%, respectively.
    Conclusion The qualified rate of the microbiological index of drinking water in Jiangxi increases year by year, but there are still some drinking water without appropriate disinfectants and water quality treatment processes. There is still a need to strengthen the purification, disinfection and monitoring of drinking water.

     

/

返回文章
返回