侯月云.北京市通州区学龄前儿童视力现况分析[J].上海预防医学,2023,35(12):1236-1241.. doi: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2023.23211
引用本文: 侯月云.北京市通州区学龄前儿童视力现况分析[J].上海预防医学,2023,35(12):1236-1241.. doi: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2023.23211
HOU Yueyun.Status analysis of visual acuity among preschool children in Tongzhou District, Beijing[J].Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine,2023,35(12):1236-1241.. doi: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2023.23211
Citation: HOU Yueyun.Status analysis of visual acuity among preschool children in Tongzhou District, Beijing[J].Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine,2023,35(12):1236-1241.. doi: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2023.23211

北京市通州区学龄前儿童视力现况分析

Status analysis of visual acuity among preschool children in Tongzhou District, Beijing

  • 摘要:
    目的 了解北京市通州区学龄前儿童视力状况及其相关影响因素。
    方法 于2022年3—8月,采取分层整群抽样的方法纳入2 199名学龄前儿童为研究对象。通过裸眼视力测查和家长问卷调查,使用多因素logistic回归模型分析视力异常的相关因素。
    结果 2 199名幼儿中,裸眼视力异常检出率13.60%。4~、5~、6~岁儿童的视力异常率分别为9.02%、18.01%、11.82%。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,与男童、年龄4~岁、初次接触电子产品的年龄≥4岁、家里采光环境好、平时持续用眼30 min经常/总是远眺休息眼睛、平时看电视的距离从来没有<2 m、家长知信行得分≥0.7分的儿童相比,女童(OR=1.411,95%CI:1.095~1.819)、年龄5~岁(OR=2.303,95%CI:1.726~3.071)、初次接触电子产品的年龄<4岁(OR=2.464,95%CI:1.120~5.424)、家里采光环境较差(OR=2.229,95%CI:1.295~3.835)、平时持续用眼30 min从来没有(OR=1.862,95%CI:1.115~3.110)及偶尔/有时(OR=1.997,95%CI:1.268~3.145)远眺休息眼睛、平时看电视的距离偶尔/有时<2 m (OR=1.369,95%CI:1.011~1.855)、家长知信行得分<0.7分(OR=1.780,95%CI:1.005~3.155)的儿童视力异常的风险更大。
    结论 学龄前儿童视力异常发生率较高,影响因素较多,应注重学龄前儿童的视力筛查和用眼健康行为健康教育,减少视力异常的发生。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To analyze the visual status and its influencing factors among preschool children in Tongzhou District.
    Methods From March to August 2022, a stratified cluster sampling was used to include 2 199 preschool children as study subjects. Visual acuity examination and parental questionnaire surveys were conducted, and a multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze the influencing factors for visual abnormalities.
    Results The detection rate of abnormal naked-eye vision among 2 199 students was 13.60%. The rates of visual abnormalities in children aged 4, 5, and 6 were 9.02%, 18.01%, and 11.82%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that compared with boys, children between 4 and 5 years old, children who first played with electronic products at the age of ≥4, those with good home lighting, those who often/always took a break and looked into the distance after using your eyes for 30 minutes, those who never watched TV at a distance < 2 meters, and children with parental knowledge-attitude-practice (KAP) scores above 0.7, girls (OR=1.411,95%CI: 1.095‒1.819), children between 5 and 6 years old (OR=2.303,95%CI: 1.726‒3.071) , children who first played with electronic products under 4 years old (OR=2.464,95%CI: 1.120‒5.424), those with poor home lighting environment (OR=2.229,95%CI: 1.295‒3.835), those who never (OR=1.862,95%CI:1.115‒3.110) or occasionally/ sometimes (OR=1.997,95%CI:1.268‒3.145) took a break and looked into the distance after using your eyes for 30 minutes, those who watched TV occasionally/sometimes at a distance < 2 meters (OR=1.369,95%CI: 1.011‒1.855), and those with parental KAP scores under 0.7 (OR=1.780,95%CI: 1.005‒3.155) had a higher risk of abnormal visual acuity.
    Conclusion The prevalence of abnormal visual acuity in preschool children is high, and there are multiple influencing factors. Attention should be paid to vision screening and healthy eye-use behavior education for preschool children to reduce the occurrence of visual abnormalities.

     

/

返回文章
返回