黑箱法与诱蚊灯法的蚊虫密度监测比较

Comparison of surveillance efficacy between black box and light trap methods

  • 摘要:
    目的 比较黑箱法与诱蚊灯法在蚊虫密度监测上的差异,探讨黑箱法在蚊虫密度监测中的作用。
    方法 在上海市宝山区8个实验点分别放置1只诱蚊灯和1只黑箱,每个点的诱蚊灯与黑箱之间相距>10 m,2023年5—9月每月开展2次监测。
    结果 黑箱法监测捕获的蚊虫总数(273只)及雌蚊数量(228只)分别是诱蚊灯法的0.795及0.774倍;2种方法监测的蚊虫密度之间(t=1.723 5,P=0.100 2)和雌蚊密度之间(t=1.805 9,P=0.101 1)的差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);2种方法监测的蚊虫密度之间(r=0.942 7)和雌蚊密度之间(r=0.896 5)存在高度相关性(均P<0.001)。黑箱法和诱蚊灯法捕获蚊虫的蚊种构成比差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.100 1,P>0.05),捕获雌蚊的蚊种构成比差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.394 4,P>0.05)。黑箱法和诱蚊灯法监测的4种不同生境蚊虫构成比均:医院(38.10%和38.77%)>郊区农户(36.26%和37.61%)>公园(14.65%和12.54%)>城区居民区(10.99%和11.08%);2种方法监测的雌蚊构成比均为:郊区农户(40.35%和42.52%)>医院(37.72%和36.05)>公园(13.16%和13.27%)>城区居民区(8.77%和8.16%);2种监测方法在不同生境中捕获蚊虫的构成比差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.598 7,P>0.05),捕获雌蚊的构成比差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.299 3,P>0.05)。
    结论 黑箱法具有设备简单、易操作、经济成本低、适用范围较广等优点,特别在灾区或条件艰苦偏远等通电难度较大的地区,黑箱法可与诱蚊灯法互换用于蚊虫密度监测中。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To evaluate the field mosquito surveillance efficacy between the black box method and the light trap method.
    Methods Eight light traps and eight black boxes were placed in each of the eight field sites in Baoshan District of Shanghai, with a minimum distance of 10 meters between each traps. Surveillance was conducted twice a month from May to September 2023.
    Results The total number of mosquitoes (273) and female mosquitoes (228) captured by the black box method were 0.795 and 0.774 times higher than those caught by the light trap method, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05) between the mosquito density (t=1.723 5, P=0.100 2) and the female mosquito density (t=1.805 9, P=0.101 1), and there was a correlation (P<0.001) between the mosquito density (r=0.942 7) and the female mosquito density (r=0.896 5). There were no significant differences in the composition ratio of mosquito species(χ2=0.100 1, P>0.05) and female mosquitoes(χ2=0.394 4, P>0.05) captured by black box and light trap methods. In four different habitats, the composition ratios of mosquito species captured by the black box and light trap methods were: hospitals (38.10% and 38.77%) > rural housing areas (36.26% and 37.61%) > parks (14.65% and 12.54%)> urban housing areas (10.99% and 11.08%), and the composition ratios of female mosquitoes captured by the black box and light trap methods were: rural housing areas (40.35% and 42.52%) > hospitals (37.72% and 36.05%) > parks (13.16% and 13.27%) > urban housing areas (8.77% and 8.16%). In different habitats, there was no significant difference in the composition ratio of mosquitoes captured by two monitoring methods(χ2=0.5987, P>0.05), and there was no significant difference in the composition ratio of female mosquitoes(χ2=0.2993, P>0.05).
    Conclusion With widen application and fewer requirements for equipment, operation skills, and use cost the black box method can be interchanged with the light trap method for monitoring mosquito density, especially in disaster areas or remote areas with difficult in having access to electricity.

     

/

返回文章
返回