医学科研人员对 P 值理解的现况

Current status of medical researchersunderstanding of P value

  • 摘要:
    目的 探究医学生、科研人员及医学统计学教师对统计学中P值的理解程度及其相关因素,以期为医学统计学教学改进提供参考。
    方法 采用方便抽样,通过问卷星发放问卷175份。问卷基于案例设计了6个关于P值的是非题。通过调查评估医学生、科研人员、专业教师对P值理解的正确率。采用描述性分析和logistic回归分析探究P值理解的相关因素。
    结果 共收集问卷170份,医学生组、科研人员组和专业教师组分别收集问卷50、98和22份。结果显示,专业教师组的正确率最高(89.5%),医学生组的正确率较低(31.6%)。logistic回归分析结果显示,博士学历者较本科及以下学历者正确率高(OR=2.10,95%CI:1.18~3.76,P=0.012),接受过医学统计学(OR=4.20,95%CI:2.23~7.93,P<0.001)或医学科研设计课程培训的研究人员(OR=2.40,95%CI:1.33~4.33,P=0.004)正确率较高。
    结论 医学生和科研人员普遍对P值存在误解,建议通过加强学历教育阶段医学统计学教学,开设医学科研设计课程,增加学生自主讨论,以及加强继续教育和科普活动等措施来提高对P值的理解。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the understanding degree of medical students, researchers, and medical statistics teachers on P value in statistics and its related factors, so as to provide references for the improvement of medical statistics teaching.
    Methods Convenience sampling method was used to distribute 175 questionnaires through the online platform questionnaire star (Wenjuanxing). Based on case study, the questionnaire was designed with 6 true-or-false questions about P values. Accuracy rate of understanding on P value by medical students, researchers and professional teachers was evaluated through questionnaire survey. Descriptive analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to explore the related factors affecting the understanding of P value.
    Results A total of 170 questionnaires were collected, with 50 from the medical students, 98 from the researchers, and 22 from the professional teachers, respectively. The results indicated that the professional teachers had the highest accuracy rate (89.5%), whereas the medical students had a relatively low accuracy rate (31.6%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that individuals with a doctoral degree, compared to those with a bachelor’s degree or below, had a higher accuracy rate (OR=2.10, 95%CI: 1.18‒3.76, P=0.012). Additionally, researchers who had received training in medical statistics (OR=4.20, 95%CI: 2.23‒7.93, P<0.001) or medical research design courses (OR=2.40, 95%CI:1.33‒4.33, P=0.004) exhibited higher accuracy rates.
    Conclusion Medical students and researchers generally have misunderstandings about P values. It is recommended to improve the understanding about P values, such as strengthening medical statistics teaching at the academic education levels, setting up medical research design courses, increasing student-led discussions, and intensifying continuing education and science popularization activities.

     

/

返回文章
返回