情绪管理课程对大一新生情绪调节、应对方式及心理健康的影响

Impact of an emotion management course on emotion regulationcoping strategiesand mental health among first-year university students

  • 摘要:
    目的 开发情绪管理课程,评估其对大一新生情绪调节、应对方式及焦虑和抑郁情绪的干预效果,为高校优化心理健康教育课程提供依据。
    方法 在某校大一新生中通过多阶段整群抽样随机抽取5个班级作为研究对象(n=169),其中3个班级为试验组(n=102),2个班级为对照组(n=67)。试验组开展常规心理健康教育课程及本研究开发的情绪管理课程,对照组仅开展常规心理健康教育课程。干预前后以情绪调节问卷(ERQ)、简易应对方式量表(SCSQ)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)等进行评估。
    结果 干预前,试验组和对照组的ERQ、SCSQ、SDS和SAS评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后,试验组与对照组相比,ERQ表达抑制维度评分(14.42±5.05,16.12±5.65)、SCSQ积极应对倾向(1.97±0.51,1.80±0.49)、消极应对倾向(1.26±0.55,1.47±0.50)、SDS(50.26±11.48,53.86±8.21)和SAS(43.96±11.97,47.59±9.50)的改善程度较高(t=2.039、2.144、2.572,Z=-2.214、-2.486,P<0.05)。试验组较干预前ERQ认知重评维度评分(32.19±5.76,30.92±6.18)、SCSQ积极应对倾向(1.97±0.51,1.83±0.48)、SDS(50.26±11.48,50.75±11.59)改善(t=-2.654、-3.027,Z=-2.100,P<0.05)。
    结论 情绪管理课程有助于提高研究对象在情绪调节过程中对认知重评策略的使用,降低表达抑制策略的使用,改善生活事件应对方式及抑郁、焦虑情绪。高校可考虑加强情绪管理教学,提高大一新生心理健康水平。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To develop an emotion management course and evaluate its effectiveness in improving emotion regulation, coping strategies, and anxiety and depression among first-year university students, so as to provide a basis for colleges to optimize mental health education courses.
    Methods Using a multi-stage cluster random sampling method, five classes of first-year students (n=169) from a university were randomly selected as participants, with three classes assigned to the experimental group (n=102) and two classes to the control group (n=67). The experimental group attended both the standard mental health education course and the emotion management course developed in this study, while the control group only attended the standard mental health education course. Pre- and post-intervention assessments were conducted using the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ), Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS).
    Results Before the intervention, there were no significant differences between the experimental group and the control group in ERQ, SCSQ, SDS, and SAS scores (P>0.05). After the intervention, the experimental group demonstrated greater improvements than the control group in the ERQ expression inhibition subscale (14.42±5.05, 16.12±5.65), SCSQ positive coping tendency (1.97±0.51, 1.80±0.49) and negative coping tendency (1.26±0.55, 1.47±0.50), as well as in SDS (50.26±11.48, 53.86±8.21) and SAS (43.96±11.97, 47.59±9.50) scores (t value: 2.039, 2.144, 2.572; Z value: -2.214, -2.486; P<0.05). Compared with pre-intervention scores, the experimental group also showed improvements in the ERQ cognitive reappraisal subscale (32.19±5.76, 30.92±6.18), SCSQ positive coping tendency (1.97±0.51, 1.83±0.48), and SDS scores (50.26±11.48, 50.75±11.59) (t value: -2.654, -3.027; Z value: -2.100, P<0.05).
    Conclusion The emotion management course effectively enhances students’ use of cognitive reappraisal strategies while reducing reliance on expressive suppression. It also contributes to improvements in coping strategies for life events and alleviates symptoms of depression and anxiety. Universities should consider integrating emotion management education into their curricula to enhance the mental well-being of first-year students.

     

/

返回文章
返回