甘油三酯、糖化血红蛋白及其交互作用对妊娠糖尿病的预测价值

Predictive value of triglyceride, glycosylated hemoglobin and their interactions on gestational diabetes mellitus

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨甘油三酯(TG)与糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)及两者的交互作用对妊娠糖尿病(GDM)的诊断价值,为今后妊娠期监测及临床决策提供依据。
    方法 回顾性收集2020年1月—2023年1月于安徽省芜湖市第二人民医院产检并住院分娩的足月单胎孕产妇100例作为研究对象,根据口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)结果将其分为GDM组(33例)和非GDM组(67例)。比较2组的一般临床资料,利用logistic回归分析影响GDM的重要因素,并通过相加交互模型分析HbA1c、TG交互作用对GDM的诊断价值。构建预测GDM发生的列线图模型并对模型进行验证。使用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析HbA1c、TG及其交互作用对GDM发生的影响。
    结果 GDM组的HbA1c、TG均高于非GDM组(P<0.001)。GDM史、糖尿病家族史、妊娠前体重指数(BMI)、高血压、TG、妊娠期经常吃高热量食物、HbA1c是孕妇发生GDM的影响因素(P<0.001)。根据logistic回归分析筛选的7个因素构建列线图模型,列线图模型对GDM发生的预测概率与实际发生概率间的平均绝对误差为0.039。ROC结果显示,HbA1c的曲线下面积(AUC)值为0.765,TG的AUC值为0.833,两者交互作用的AUC值为0.894,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
    结论 HbA1c、TG不仅是GDM的影响因素,而且两者对GDM具有正交互作用,两者协同交互作用对GDM的诊断价值大于两者单独存在时对GDM的诊断价值。本研究构建的列线图模型对于预测GDM有较好的区分度、准确度和临床实用性。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of triglyceride (TG) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and their interactions on gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), so as to provide a basis for future pregnancy monitoring and clinical decision-making.
    Methods Data of 100 full-term singleton pregnant women who were examined and delivered in the Second People’s Hospital of Wuhu City from January 2020 to January 2023 were retrospectively collected, and they were divided into GDM group (n=33) and non-GDM group (n=67) according to the results of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The general clinical data of the two groups were compared, and the independent risk factors affecting the occurrence of GDM were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, the diagnostic value of the interaction of HbA1c and TG on GDM was analyzed using additive interaction model. A nomogram model to predict the occurrence of GDM was constructed and verified. The effects of HbA1c, TG and their interactions on the occurrence of GDM were analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC).
    Results HbA1c and TG were significantly higher in the GDM group than those in the non-GDM group (P<0.001). History of GDM, family history of diabetes mellitus, body mass index (BMI) before pregnancy, hypertension, TG, frequent consumption of high-calorie food during pregnancy, and HbA1c were the influencing factors for the occurrence of GDM in pregnant women (P<0.001). The nomogram model was constructed according to the seven factors screened by logistic regression analysis, and the average absolute error between the predicted probability by the nomogram model and actual probability of the occurrence of GDM was 0.039. The ROC results showed that the area under the curve (AUC) value of HbA1c was 0.765, the AUC value of TG was 0.833, and the AUC value of the interaction between TG and HbA1c was 0.894, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05).
    Conclusion HbA1c and TG are not only influencing factors for GDM, but also their interactions are positively correlated with the occurrence of GDM. The diagnostic value of the two synergistically interacting on GDM is greater than that of them independently on GDM. The nomogram model constructed in this study has good differentiation, accuracy and clinical practicability for predicting the incidence of GDM.

     

/

返回文章
返回