基于月经日记的医科女大学生痛经症状调查

A menstrual diary–based investigation of dysmenorrhea symptoms among female medical students

  • 摘要:目的】 采用基于月经日记的观察性研究,描述医科女大学生痛经现况及疼痛动态特征。【方法】 于2021年4—6月,在医学院招募女大学生填写月经日记,记录2个周期的痛经特征。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)记录痛经评分(无痛0分、轻度1~3分、中度4~6分、重度7~10分)。共回收月经日记323份,其中303份有效(有效率为93.80%),包含596个完整月经周期,293人完成2周期记录用于持续性痛经分析。以人数为基数计算期间/时点/持续性检出率,并采用Cochran’s Q检验及Bonferroni校正的McNemar检验进行配对比较;以周期为基数计算出现痛经的周期,比较不同程度痛经疼痛开始时间、峰值时间及持续天数分布(X2检验/Fisher精确概率检验)。【结果】 303名女大学生中,269名在首次记录周期内存在痛经,任一周期痛经者288人; 596个完整月经周期记录中有527个存在痛经(88.42%),293名完成2个完整记录周期的学生中有239名持续痛经者。女大学生期间、时点、持续性痛经检出率分别为95.05%(288/303)、88.78%(269/303)、81.57%(239/293)(Q=61.61,P<0.001) ,持续重度痛经的检出率为5.12%。527个痛经周期中,不同程度痛经在疼痛开始时间(P=0.003)和疼痛持续天数(P<0.001)的分布上差异均有统计学意义,轻度多始发于行经首日(52.83%),中度多在经前(50.19%);疼痛持续天数随痛经程度加重而延长,轻、中、重度痛经周期中疼痛持续≥4 d的比例分别为13.20%、43.03%和51.56%。不同程度痛经的疼痛评分均分均以经期首日最高,随后逐日下降趋稳。【结论】 医科女大学生痛经普遍存在,且不同程度痛经在起始时间、持续时间及疼痛动态变化方面存在差异。应加强对持续性中重度痛经人群的识别与健康指导,必要时开展医学评估。

     

    Abstract: Objective To describe the prevalence and dynamic pain characteristics of dysmenorrhea among female medical students using a menstrual diary-based observational study. Methods From April to June 2021, female students were recruited from a medical college to complete menstrual diaries and record dysmenorrhea-related characteristics for two menstrual cycles. Dysmenorrhea severity was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) (no pain:0; mild: 1-3; moderate: 4-6; severe: 7-10). A total of 323 diaries were collected, of which 303 were valid (valid response rate: 93.80%), covering 596 complete menstrual cycles. Among them, 293 participants completed diaries for two cycles and were included in the analysis of persistent dysmenorrhea. Period, point, and persistent prevalence were calculated using the number of participants as the denominator. Paired comparisons were performed using Cochran’s Q test and Bonferroni-adjusted McNemar tests. Using menstrual cycles with dysmenorrhea as the unit of analysis, the distributions of pain onset, peak timing, and pain duration across different severities were compared using the X2 tests or Fisher’s exact tests. Results Among 303 female college students, 269 experienced dysmenorrhea during the first recorded cycle, and 288 had dysmenorrhea in any cycle; among 596 complete menstrual cycles recorded, 527 were associated with dysmenorrhea (88.42%), and among 293 students who completed 2 complete recorded cycles, 239 had persistent dysmenorrhea. The period, point, and persistent prevalence of dysmenorrhea among female college students were 95.05% (288/303), 88.78% (269/303), and 81.57% (239/293), respectively (Q=61.61, P<0.001). The prevalence of persistently severe dysmenorrhea was 5.12%. Among the 527 dysmenorrheic cycles, there were statistically significant differences in the distribution of pain onset time (P=0.003) and pain duration days (P<0.001) among different degrees of dysmenorrhea; mild dysmenorrhea mostly started on the first day of menstruation (52.83%), and moderate dysmenorrhea mostly started before menstruation (50.19%). Pain duration increased with severity; the proportions of cycles with pain lasting ≥4 days were 13.20%, 43.03%, and 51.56% for mild, moderate, and severe dysmenorrhea cycles, respectively. For all severity groups, mean pain scores peaked on the first day of menstruation and then decreased day by day to a stable level. Conclusion Dysmenorrhea is highly prevalent among female medical students, and differences exist across pain severity levels in onset time, duration, and dynamic changes in pain. Identification and health guidance for those with persistently moderate-to-severe dysmenorrhea should be strengthened, and medical evaluation should be conducted when necessary.

     

/

返回文章
返回