上海市社区成年人群的疫苗素养评价指标体系构建

Construction of a vaccine literacy evaluation indicator system for community-dwelling adults in Shanghai

  • 摘要:
    目的 构建面向社区成年人群的疫苗素养评价指标体系,为开发疫苗素养测量工具提供理论依据和评价基础。
    方法 通过系统文献回顾及研究小组讨论,初步构建疫苗素养评价指标池。邀请免疫规划、疾病控制、流行病学等相关领域专家,开展两轮德尔菲专家咨询。依据指标重要性评分的均值、变异系数及满分比等进行筛选与优化,最终形成疫苗素养评价指标体系。随后将部分指标转化为可作答的调查量表,采用便利抽样法选取上海市某社区成年居民开展调查,并进行初步信效度分析。
    结果 参与咨询专家25人,两轮问卷有效回收率分别为100.00%和92.00%,专家权威系数(Cr)为0.90。两轮肯德尔协调系数(Kendall’s W)分别为0.386和0.413(P<0.001)。第二轮各指标综合评分为4.04~5.00分,变异系数为0~0.25。经两轮咨询和指标修订,最终形成包含知识素养、能力素养、决策素养、特定疫苗素养和推荐素养5个维度,共53项指标的疫苗素养评价指标体系。选取其中采用Likert评分的部分条目转化为居民调查量表进行初步信效度分析,量表整体Cronbach’s α系数为0.850,KMO值为0.91;探索性因子分析提取3个公因子,累计方差贡献率为54.8%,各条目因子载荷均>0.4。
    结论 本研究构建的面向上海市社区成年人群的疫苗素养评价指标体系,可为疫苗素养群体综合评价、社区疫苗健康教育和免疫服务改进提供参考。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To construct a vaccine literacy evaluation system for community adults and to provide a basis for developing vaccine literacy measurement tools.
    Methods The initial pool of vaccine literacy indicators was developed through a systematic literature review and group discussions, with reference to existing scales. Experts in immunization programs, disease control, epidemiology and related fields were invited to participate in two rounds of Delphi consultations. Indicators were screened and refined using importance scores, coefficients of variation, and full-score rates to form the evaluation system. Subsequently, selected indicators were converted into questionnaire items, and a convenience sample of community residents was surveyed for preliminary reliability and validity testing.
    Results A total of 25 experts participated in the consultation. The effective response rates for the two rounds of questionnaires were 100.00% and 92.00%, respectively, and the expert authority coefficient was 0.90. Kendall’s concordance coefficients (Kendall’s W) for the two rounds were 0.386 and 0.413, respectively (both P<0.001). In the second round, the overall scores for the indicators ranged from 4.04 to 5.00, with coefficients of variation ranging from 0 to 0.25. After two rounds of expert consultation and revision, a vaccine literacy evaluation index system was established, comprising 53 indicators across five dimensions, including knowledge, ability, decision-making, vaccine-specific literacy, and recommendation literacy. Selected Likert-scaled items were converted into a questionnaire for preliminary reliability and validity analyses among residents. The overall Cronbach’s α was 0.850, and the KMO value was 0.91. Exploratory factor analyses identified three common factors, explaining 54.8% of the total variance, with all factor loadings above 0.4.
    Conclusion The vaccine literacy evaluation index system for community adults in Shanghai, developed in this study, can serve as a reference for comprehensive assessment of population vaccine literacy, community vaccine health education, and improvement of immunization services.

     

/

返回文章
返回