合肥市5所养老机构老年人死亡态度现状及影响因素分析

Analysis of the Current Status and Influencing Factors of Death Attitudes Among Older Adults in Five Elderly Care Institutions in Hefei

  • 摘要: 【目的】 探讨合肥市养老机构老年人死亡态度现状及其影响因素,为开展老年人生命意义教育和临终关怀提供支持。【方法】 采用方便抽样法,于2023年7-8月选取合肥市五所养老机构的206名老年人进行问卷调查。调查工具包括:(1)一般人口学资料调查表;(2)生活质量与家庭支持相关项目调查表;(3)死亡态度描绘量表修订版。使用SPSS 21.0软件进行描述性分析、t检验、方差分析及多元线性回归分析。【结果】 在合肥市养老机构老年人死亡态度各维度得分由高至低依次为:自然接受(4.19±0.58)、死亡逃避(3.26±0.89)、逃离接受(2.91±0.89)、趋近接受(2.32±0.78)、死亡恐惧(2.17±0.69)。多元线性回归分析显示,随着年龄增长,90岁及以上高龄老人的死亡恐惧低于60-69岁组(B = -0.439,P = 0.010)。文化程度方面,初中文化水平老人的自然接受得分高于小学及以下组(B = 0.312,P = 0.008);同时,初中及以上文化程度的老人其趋近接受得分均低于小学及以下群体(初中:B = -0.342,P = 0.014;高中/中专:B = -0.449,P = 0.001;专科及以上:B = -0.450,P < 0.001)。宗教信仰对死亡态度亦有影响,有信仰的老人表现出更高的趋近接受倾向(B = 0.765,P < 0.001)。家属探视频次同样重要,每月探望至少一次的老人其趋近接受得分低于探望次数更少的老人(B = -0.260,P = 0.017)。交互效应分析进一步表明,宗教信仰与家属探视频次在趋近接受维度上存在显著交互作用(B=0.794,P=0.014),提示宗教信仰增强了家属探视对趋近接受态度的正向影响。【结论】 合肥市养老机构老年人的死亡态度总体积极,其中自然接受水平较高。死亡态度受年龄、文化程度、宗教信仰及家属探视频次等因素影响,且宗教信仰与家属探视频次在趋近接受维度上存在交互作用。提示养老机构可结合老年人的年龄、文化程度及家庭支持状况,有针对性地开展死亡教育与心理支持,重点关注低龄、低文化程度及家庭支持不足的老年人,并关注有宗教信仰老年人的灵性关怀需求。

     

    Abstract: Objective To explore the current attitudes towards death among elderly individuals in senior care institutions in Hefei City and the influencing factors, providing support for the implementation of life meaning education and end-of-life care for the elderly. Methods A convenience sampling method was employed to conduct a questionnaire survey of 206 elderly individuals in five senior care institutions in Hefei City from July to August 2023. The survey instruments included: (1) a general demographic questionnaire; (2) a questionnaire on quality of life and family support; and (3) the Chinese version of the Death Attitude Profile-Revised. Descriptive analysis, t-tests, variance analysis, and multiple linear regression analysis were performed using SPSS 21.0 software. Results The scores of the dimensions of death attitudes among elderly individuals in senior care institutions in Hefei City ranked from high to low as follows: Natural Acceptance (4.19±0.58), Death Avoidance (3.26±0.89), Escape Acceptance (2.91±0.89), Approach Acceptance (2.32±0.78), and Fear of Death (2.17±0.69). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that: Fear of Death was significantly lower in those aged 90 and above compared to the 60-69 age group (B = -0.439, P = 0.010). Regarding education level, Natural Acceptance scores were significantly higher in those with junior high school education compared to those with primary school education or below (B = 0.312, P = 0.008); simultaneously, Approach Acceptance scores were significantly lower in those with junior high school education or above compared to those with primary school education or below (Junior high school: B = -0.342, P = 0.014; senior high school/technical secondary school: B = -0.449, P = 0.001; college and above: B = -0.450, P < 0.001). Religious belief also significantly influenced death attitudes, with believers showing higher Approach Acceptance (B = 0.765, P < 0.001). Family visitation frequency was important, with those receiving visits at least once per month having significantly lower Approach Acceptance scores compared to those visited less frequently (B = -0.260, P = 0.017). Interaction analysis revealed a significant interaction between religious belief and visitation frequency on approach acceptance (B=0.794, P=0.014), suggesting that religious belief amplifies the positive influence of family visitation on approach acceptance. Conclusion Elderly residents in senior care institutions in Hefei City generally showed positive attitudes toward death, with a relatively high level of Natural Acceptance. Attitudes toward death were influenced by age, educational level, religious belief, and family visitation frequency, and a significant interaction between religious belief and family visitation frequency was found in the dimension of Approach Acceptance. These findings suggest that senior care institutions should provide targeted death education and psychological support according to the elderly individuals’ age, educational level, and family support status, with particular attention to younger elderly residents, those with lower educational levels, and those with insufficient family support, while also addressing the spiritual care needs of elderly individuals with religious beliefs.

     

/

返回文章
返回