压疮愈合计分法在老年压疮清创效果评价中的应用

Pressure ulcer scale for healing applied in evaluating debridement effect on pressure ulcers

  • 摘要: 目的探讨压疮愈合计分(PUSH)法在老年压疮病人的不同清创方法效果评定中的应用价值。方法2010年5月-2012年8月,60例(82处)Ⅱ~IV期压疮并有清创指征的压疮伤口,随机分为自溶性清创组30例(42处);联合清创组30例(40处)。2组均按流程分别评估伤口与全身情况后,再进行冲洗、清创。2组伤口在清创后第7天、第14天、第21天进行观察和评价,按照PUSH计分表内容动态计分,用SPSS 11.0软件进行统计学分析。结果联合清创组与自溶性清创组的PUSH分值比较,在清创后第7天(P>0.05)、第14天(P<0.05)、第21天(P<0.01),联合清创组伤口PUSH分值下降快于自溶性清创组。结论联合清创是老年病人压疮的较好的清创方法,可缩短清创期,促进伤口的愈合。用PUSH计分法评价清创效果,方法简便易行,结果可信有效。

     

    Abstract: Objective To explore the value of the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) tool in evaluating the effect of debridement on pressure ulcers in elder patients. Methods A group of 60 patients with (82 sites) Ⅱ-IV grade pressure ulcers were recruited in the study. The ulcers were randomly assigned into autolytic debridement group(n=42) and combined debridement group(n=40).Two groups of wounds were assessed and debrided by consensus procedure porcess respectively.The wounds were observed and evaluated by trained nurses at 7,14,21days after debredement, and the results used in PUSH scoring were recorded and subjected to statistical analysis with the SPSS 11.0 software. Results The value of pressure ulcer scale for healing (PUSH) for autolytic、combined debridement group, at 7days(P>0.05) were not significantly different, at 14 days(P<0.05),and at 21days (P<0.01) were significantly different. With wounds in combined debridement group, PUSH scores decreased faster than those in the autolytic debridement group. Conclusion The combined debridement method used in elder patients is safe and effective, which can shorten debridement time and improve wounds healing as well. The Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing is easy to use and its result is reliable, giving a quantitative objective evaluation of debridement effect on pressure ulcers.

     

/

返回文章
返回