许闯, 李物华, 王芳, 乔冬梅, 王伟炳. 高血压细节管理对社区高血压患者血压控制的效果及影响因素分析[J]. 上海预防医学, 2017, 29(3): 214-217, 232. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2017.03.015
引用本文: 许闯, 李物华, 王芳, 乔冬梅, 王伟炳. 高血压细节管理对社区高血压患者血压控制的效果及影响因素分析[J]. 上海预防医学, 2017, 29(3): 214-217, 232. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2017.03.015
Chuan XU, Wu-hua LI, Fang WANG, Dong-mei QIAO, Wei-bing WANG. Analysis of the effects and influencing factors of detailed management program for hypertension on the blood pressure control for hypertensive patients in communities[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2017, 29(3): 214-217, 232. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2017.03.015
Citation: Chuan XU, Wu-hua LI, Fang WANG, Dong-mei QIAO, Wei-bing WANG. Analysis of the effects and influencing factors of detailed management program for hypertension on the blood pressure control for hypertensive patients in communities[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2017, 29(3): 214-217, 232. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2017.03.015

高血压细节管理对社区高血压患者血压控制的效果及影响因素分析

Analysis of the effects and influencing factors of detailed management program for hypertension on the blood pressure control for hypertensive patients in communities

  • 摘要:
    目的分析社区高血压细节管理对社区高血压患者血压控制的效果及其影响因素,为完善社区高血压细节管理模式提供依据。
    方法按照入选标准,选取400例上海市枫林社区当年新发现的原发性高血压患者,随机分为干预组和对照组,每组200人。干预组采用群体健康教育和个性化指导相结合的方式进行管理,对照组采取常规的高血压分组管理。在干预前(2007年1月)和干预后(2015年1月)比较两组的血压控制情况。
    结果干预后,干预组的平均收缩压(SBP)和平均舒张压(DBP)较对照组分别低8.03 mmHg和6.55 mmHg,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。在血压达标率、危险分层及服药依从性方面干预组均优于对照组(P值均 < 0.05);影响血压控制效果的主要因素为性别、体质指数、高盐膳食和吸烟。
    结论上海市社区高血压疾病细节管理对高血压患者的血压控制效果显著,是促进高血压患者血压稳定的有效途径。

     

    Abstract:
    ObjectiveTo analyze the effects and influencing factors of community-based detailed management program for hypertension on the blood pressure control for hypertensive patients in communities so as to provide bases for improving the community-based detailed management mode for hypertension.
    MethodsIn accordance with relevant selection criteria, 400 hypertensive patients living in the Fenglin Community of Shanghai who were diagnosed with idiopathic hypertension at the year in question were randomly selected, and were separated into an intervention group and a control group, with 200 patients belonging to each group. Community health education was combined with individual guidance in managing the intervention group while the control group was managed via conventional hypertension grouping. The blood pressure control of these two groups before(Jan., 2007) and after(Jan., 2015) the intervention were compared.
    ResultsAfter the intervention, the average systolic blood pressure(SBP) and the average diastolic blood pressure(DBP) of the intervention group were below those of control group by 8.03 mmHg and 6.55 mmHg, respectively, which showed statistic significance(P < 0.01). The intervention group was better than the control group in terms of rate of reaching target blood pressure, risk stratification and medication compliance (P < 0.05); the main factors influencing the effect of blood pressure control were sex, body mass index, high salt diet and smoking.
    ConclusionThe community-based detailed management program for hypertension in Shanghai has achieved remarkable effects in controlling the blood pressure of hypertensive patients, and is an efficient approach to help stabilize the blood pressure thereof.

     

/

返回文章
返回