程天一, 王俊, 包丽静, 庞小芬. 群组看病应用于老年骨质疏松高危人群的效果分析[J]. 上海预防医学, 2017, 29(3): 218-221, 243. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2017.03.016
引用本文: 程天一, 王俊, 包丽静, 庞小芬. 群组看病应用于老年骨质疏松高危人群的效果分析[J]. 上海预防医学, 2017, 29(3): 218-221, 243. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2017.03.016
Tian-yi HENG, Jun WANG, Li-jing BAO, Xiao-fen PANG. Analysis on the effects of group medical visits on high-risk elder people suffering senile osteoporosis[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2017, 29(3): 218-221, 243. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2017.03.016
Citation: Tian-yi HENG, Jun WANG, Li-jing BAO, Xiao-fen PANG. Analysis on the effects of group medical visits on high-risk elder people suffering senile osteoporosis[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2017, 29(3): 218-221, 243. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2017.03.016

群组看病应用于老年骨质疏松高危人群的效果分析

Analysis on the effects of group medical visits on high-risk elder people suffering senile osteoporosis

  • 摘要:
    目的研究群组看病模式对老年骨质疏松高危人群的疗效。
    方法收集年龄65岁以上、OSTA指数小于-4的骨质疏松高危人群86例,随机分为群组干预组和对照组,每组43例。应用双能X线吸收仪(DXA)测定左股骨颈骨密度值(LFN BMD),同时测定血生化指标及骨生化、代谢指标。应用骨质疏松知识问卷(OKT)及骨质疏松自我效能量表(OSES)进行评分。群组干预包括:健康教育及个体化的技能指导,病情监测,小组活动及处方开药等4项内容。干预1年后,两组再次进行上述项目评估。
    结果干预后,两组除血Ca2+、P3+、LFN BMD的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)外,干预组的OKT、OSES得分,血清25羟维生素D325(OH)VitD3水平均高于对照组及组内干预前(P < 0.05);干预组的血甲状旁腺激素(PTH)、I型前胶原氨基末端前肽(PINP),I型胶原交联羧基末端肽(β-CTX)水平均低于对照组及组内干预前(P < 0.05)。
    结论群组看病是一种适合骨质疏松高危人群的有效的社区管理干预模式

     

    Abstract:
    ObjectiveTo explore the therapeutic effect of group medical visits on high-risk elder people suffering senile osteoporosis.
    MethodsA total of 86 high-risk elder people aged over 65, suffering senile osteoporosis and with the OSTA index below -4 were randomly selected, and were separated into an intervention group and a control group, with 43 patients belonging to each group. The dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry(DXA) was used to measure the left femoral neck bone mineral density (LFN BMD), and relevant biochemical indexes thereof and biochemical indicators of bone metabolism thereof were measured at the same time. The osteoporotic knowledge test(OKT) and the osteoporotic self-efficiency scheme(OSES) were used to make relevant evaluations. Group interventions included the following four items: health edutaion and individual technical guidance, state of illness monitoring, group activities and prescription of medicines. At one year after the intervention, the above-mentioned items were to be evaluated again for the two groups.
    ResultsAfter the intervention, the blood calcium(Ca2+), phosphorus(P3+) and LFN BMD of the two groups had no statistical difference(P>0.05); the OKT and OSES scores as well as the level of 25(OH)VitD3 of the intervention group were all higher than those of the control group as well as those of the intervention group before the intervention(P < 0.05). After intervention, the PTH, PINP and β-CTX levels of the intervention group were lower than those of the control group as well as those of the intervention group before the intervention(P < 0.05).
    ConclusionThe group medical visit is an effective community-based management intervention mode suitable for high-risk patients suffering osteoporosis.

     

/

返回文章
返回