应用SF-36量表对隔代抚养大学生生存质量的研究

袁飞飞; 王红; 吕甜甜; 顾明明; 刘丽娜; 梁林峰; 南园; 叶冬青; 王斌

doi:10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2017.08.003

应用SF-36量表对隔代抚养大学生生存质量的研究

Life quality study for grandparents-raised college students by means of SF-36 Scale

摘要

摘要:
目的对隔代抚养与亲代抚养的大学生生存质量进行比较。
方法从安徽医科大学随机抽取492名在校大学生，其中隔代抚养大学生46人，亲代抚养大学生446人。有记名进行生存质量状况及影响因素问卷调查。
结果在校大学生中，隔代抚养大学生与亲代抚养大学生的生理机能领域和一般健康状况领域的差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。隔代抚养大学生与亲代抚养大学生在性别、自信、和家人的通话频率等方面的差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
结论隔代抚养大学生在生理机能领域和一般健康状况领域的得分比亲代抚养大学生得分低，隔代抚养大学生中女性比例较高、自信心较低以及和家人较高的通话频率可能是导致其生存质量较亲代抚养大学生生存质量低的原因。因此，提高隔代抚养大学生的自信心以及增强人际交往能力是提高其生存质量的有效途径。

Abstract:
ObjectiveTo compare the college students' quality of life between grandparents-raised college students and parents-raised students.
MethodsA total of 492 undergraduates were randomly selected from Anhui Medical University, including 46 grandparents-raised college students, and 446 parents-raised college students. Nominative questionnaires were done for quality of life status and its influencing factors.
ResultsWith the included college students, the differences between grandparents-raised college students and parents-raised ones in the fields of physiological function (RF) and general health (GH) were statistically significant (P < 0.05). And in terms of gender, self-confidence, and the frequency of telephone-communication with their families, the differences between the two groups of students were also statistically significant (P < 0.05).
ConclusionGrandparents-raised students in the fields of physiological function and general health scores were lower than the parents-raised college students. Among them, there was higher proportion of females, lower self-confidence and more prolonged family calls, which might lead to the lower level of their living quality compared with the parents-raised students. It is held that enhancing grandparents-raised students' self-confidence and interpersonal skills is an effective way to improve their quality of life.

HTML全文

参考文献(16)

施引文献

资源附件(0)