许瑾, 颜敏, 康婷, 吴丹. 上海市静安区、松江区居民食品安全满意度调查[J]. 上海预防医学, 2018, 30(6): 439-443. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2018.18829
引用本文: 许瑾, 颜敏, 康婷, 吴丹. 上海市静安区、松江区居民食品安全满意度调查[J]. 上海预防医学, 2018, 30(6): 439-443. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2018.18829
Jin XU, Min YAN, Ting KANG, Dan WU. Satisfaction survey on food safety in residents of Songjiang and Jing′an Districts of Shanghai City[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2018, 30(6): 439-443. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2018.18829
Citation: Jin XU, Min YAN, Ting KANG, Dan WU. Satisfaction survey on food safety in residents of Songjiang and Jing′an Districts of Shanghai City[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2018, 30(6): 439-443. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2018.18829

上海市静安区、松江区居民食品安全满意度调查

Satisfaction survey on food safety in residents of Songjiang and Jing′an Districts of Shanghai City

  • 摘要:
    目的将上海市静安区和松江区作为上海市食品安全满意度调查地区,调查其食品安全工作的成效及存在的问题,并提出改进建议。
    方法参照《食品安全满意度调查工作指南》,从食品安全满意度、食品安全示范城市创建工作知晓率与支持率、食品安全知识知晓率与行为形成率三方面进行调查。
    结果松江区与静安区的结果分别为食品安全满意度(83.1分和80分)、创建工作知晓率(87.2%和85.1%)和支持率(99.8%与99.2%)以及知识知晓率(87.2%和85.6%)和行为形成率(77.8%和74.5%)。两区在集市/早夜市、“三小”店铺,食品添加剂等假冒伪劣产品,网上订餐等方面还存在一定问题。
    结论两区食品安全工作总体均处较高水平,达到国家要求,松江区稍优于静安区。但仍存在一定的食品安全与卫生问题,需要从整体上持续改进。

     

    Abstract:
    ObjectiveJing′an and Songjiang Districts were selected as the survey areas for the study of satisfaction with food safety among residents in Shanghai.Based on results from these two districts, we could not only identify the effectiveness and problems with food safety work in these two districts, but also put forward suggestions for improvement of Shanghai food safety.
    MethodsAccording to the Guide to Investigation of Food Safety Satisfaction, We investigated these aspects: food safety satisfaction, cognition and support rate of food safety establishment, cognition rate of food safety knowledge and behavior formation rate.
    ResultsBoth Jing′an and Songjiang Districts were at a relatively high level, in reaching the requirements of the nation for food safety.Songjiang was a little higher than Jingan in this regard.The results of Songjiang and Jing′an:food satisfaction(83.1, 80), cognition rate of food safety establishment (87.2%, 85.1%), support rate of food safety establishment(99.8%, 99.2%), cognition rate of food safety knowledge (87.2%, 85.6%), behavior formation rate(77.8%, 74.5%).In particular, there were still problems in the market/ the early or night market, the "three small" stores, the food additives, and others as counterfeit and shoddy products, online ordering of restaurants, and other problems.
    ConclusionFood safety works of the two districts are at a high level in reaching the national requirements, and Songjiang District is slightly better than Jingan District.It is necessary to improve the food safety work continuously.

     

/

返回文章
返回