孟莉, 王红兵, 张洁琼. 上海市静安区40~65周岁宫颈癌高危人群筛查分析[J]. 上海预防医学, 2019, 31(S1): 14-19. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2019.18925
引用本文: 孟莉, 王红兵, 张洁琼. 上海市静安区40~65周岁宫颈癌高危人群筛查分析[J]. 上海预防医学, 2019, 31(S1): 14-19. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2019.18925
MENG Li, WANG Hong-bing, ZHANG Jie-qiong. Screening analysis of high-risk population of cervical cancer aged 40-65 in Jingan District of Shanghai[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2019, 31(S1): 14-19. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2019.18925
Citation: MENG Li, WANG Hong-bing, ZHANG Jie-qiong. Screening analysis of high-risk population of cervical cancer aged 40-65 in Jingan District of Shanghai[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2019, 31(S1): 14-19. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2019.18925

上海市静安区40~65周岁宫颈癌高危人群筛查分析

Screening analysis of high-risk population of cervical cancer aged 40-65 in Jingan District of Shanghai

  • 摘要:
    目的探索对上海市静安区宫颈癌高危人群的识别和筛查分析。
    方法探索采用宫颈检查联合调查问卷的筛查方法来识别宫颈癌高危人群,并对筛查出来的这部分高危人群进行健康干预。
    结果在2016年11月至2017年10月期间,对上海市静安区547名年龄在40~65周岁的妇女开展宫颈检查,采用宫颈TCT和HPV检测以及自制的调查问卷,共发现:宫颈癌2人和癌前病变9人(占2.01%,这11人不在本次研究范围内);高危人群188人(占34.37%,其中被评价为高危A、高危B和高危C的分别为26人、92人和70人),纳入高危组;健康人群348人(占63.62%),纳入了对照组。将高危组和对照组进行对比分析,高危组中发生同房后出血和(或)绝经后出血、阴道分泌物异常增多、近2年内有宫颈HPV感染病史、性伴侣数量多或不固定、有吸烟吸毒等不良嗜好者,明显高于对照组,χ2分别为39.31、55.20、45.99、5.58和26.61,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。对于这部分高危人群进行群体干预和个体干预,干预前后对疾病的认识、行为的改变,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
    结论通过宫颈检查联合调查问卷的筛查方法,可以探索识别出宫颈癌高危人群;对于这部分被识别出来的人群进行健康干预,是积极防治宫颈癌的有效手段。

     

    Abstract:
    ObjectiveTo explore the pattern of identification and the model of health intervention for high-risk groups of cervical cancer in Jing'an District of Shanghai.
    MethodsThe screening method that combined cervical screening with questionnaire was used to identify the high-risk groups of cervical cancer. Health intervention was then conducted on those of the high-risk groups that had been screened out.
    ResultsDuring November 2016 and October 2017, 547 women aged 40 to 65 years old in Jing'an District of Shanghai received cervical examination, with cervical TCT(thinprep cytologic test)and HPV detection and self-made questionnaire adopted. And 2 patients with cervical cancer and 9 with precancerous lesions were found in the examination. These 11 patients(2.01%)were not in the scope of the study. In our study, 188 women(34.37%)were included in the high-risk groups, with 26 in high-risk group A, 92 in high-risk group B and 70 in high-risk group C. And 348 healthy women(63.62%)were included in the control group. In comparison between high-risk groups and control group, the high-risk groups showed more bad conditions or habits than the control group, including bleeding after intercourse and(or)postmenopausal bleeding, increase in vaginal secretions, history of cervical HPV infection in the last 2 years, large or non-fixed numbers of sexual partners, and smoking and drug abuse, etc. Chi square of the these cases were 39.31, 55.20, 45.99, 55.20 and 45.99, respectively, with a statistic difference(P < 0.05). Group intervention and individual intervention were applied on the high-risk groups. There was a statistic difference(P < 0.05)with this group of women in the understanding of this disease and the changes in behaviors before and after the interventions.
    ConclusionHigh-risk groups of cervical cancer can be identified through the screening method that combines cervical screening with questionnaire. Health intervention on those high-risk groups is an effective way to prevent cervical cancer.

     

/

返回文章
返回