周月芳, 曲爽笑, 罗春燕, 孙力菁, 杨东玲, 张喆. 上海市中小学生受校园欺侮现状及影响因素分析[J]. 上海预防医学, 2019, 31(5): 353-357. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2019.19355
引用本文: 周月芳, 曲爽笑, 罗春燕, 孙力菁, 杨东玲, 张喆. 上海市中小学生受校园欺侮现状及影响因素分析[J]. 上海预防医学, 2019, 31(5): 353-357. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2019.19355
ZHOU Yue-fang, QU Shuang-xiao, LUO Chun-yan, SUN Li-jing, YANG Dong-ling, ZHANG Zhe. Status quo and influencing factors of school bullying with primary and secondary school students in Shanghai[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2019, 31(5): 353-357. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2019.19355
Citation: ZHOU Yue-fang, QU Shuang-xiao, LUO Chun-yan, SUN Li-jing, YANG Dong-ling, ZHANG Zhe. Status quo and influencing factors of school bullying with primary and secondary school students in Shanghai[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2019, 31(5): 353-357. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2019.19355

上海市中小学生受校园欺侮现状及影响因素分析

Status quo and influencing factors of school bullying with primary and secondary school students in Shanghai

  • 摘要:
    目的探讨上海市中小学生受校园欺侮现状及影响因素,为开展相关干预工作提供依据。
    方法采用多阶段分层整群抽样方法,在全市36所中小学校采用“学生健康状况及健康影响因素调查表”对8 874名四年级至高三年级中小学生进行匿名问卷调查。
    结果上海市中小学生受校园欺侮报告率为4.7%,男生明显高于女生。小学生报告率最高,其次为初中学生,高中生最低。各类校园欺侮中,被别人恶意取笑报告率最高为2.6%;1.7%的学生曾遭受2种以上类型的校园欺侮;经常遭受家长打骂、有网络成瘾倾向、曾经有烟酒行为、重组家庭等为受校园欺侮的危险因素。
    结论本市中小学生中均存在校园欺侮行为,心理/言语类欺侮是主要欺侮类型。应根据学生的身心发育特点及欺侮类型,结合相关危险行为因素,采取有针对性的干预措施。将校园欺侮的干预纳入青少年健康危险行为干预体系,实施综合干预。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the status quo and influencing factors of school bullying with primary and middle school students in Shanghai, and to provide evidence for relevant intervention work.
    Methods A multi-stage stratified cluster sampling method was used to conduct an anonymous questionnaire survey of 8 874 middle school students from the fourth grade of primary schools to the third grade of senior high schools, covering 36 schools altogether in the city.
    Results The rate of school bullying reported by primary and secondary school students in Shanghai was 4.7%.Male students were significantly higher than female students in report rate.The primary school students reported the highest rate, followed by junior high school students and high school students reported the lowest.The highest rate of bullying type was being teased maliciously by others, accounting for 2.6%; and 1.7% of students suffered from more than two types of school bullying; they were often exposed to risk factors for being bullied on campus, such as parental beating and scolding, internet addiction, alcohol and tobacco behavior, and their family reorganization could be a risk factor too.
    Conclusion There are school bullying behaviors with primary and middle school students in this city.Psychological/verbal bullying is the main type.Targeted interventions should be adopted in consideration of the characteristics of students′ physical and mental development and the type of bullying, combined with relevant risk behavior factors.Intervention of school bullying should be incorporated into the comprehensive adolescent health risk behavior intervention system.

     

/

返回文章
返回