层次分析－模糊综合评价法在免疫胶体金定性快速检测产品综合性能评价中的应用

夏苏捷; 李永吉; 吕沈亮; 潘颖

doi:10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2020.20106

层次分析－模糊综合评价法在免疫胶体金定性快速检测产品综合性能评价中的应用

Comprehensive performance evaluation of immunocolloidal gold qualitative rapid detection kits based on AHP-FCE method

摘要

摘要:
目的建立科学客观的免疫胶体金定性快速检测(快检)产品综合性能评估模型，为类似产品的总体评价提供方法参考。
方法纳入影响定性快检产品性能的各种因素，构建1个包含4个一级指标和18个二级指标的产品综合性能评估指标体系。结合层次分析(AHP)－模糊综合评价(FCE)法，确定评价指标权重和分级临界值，并对6种品牌呋喃唑酮代谢物快速检测试剂盒的综合性能进行评价。
结果根据隶属度最大原则，品牌A、B、C、D、E、F的评价等级分别为优良、优异、一般、优异、一般、优异。按照百分制计算6家品牌产品的得分，品牌B得分最高，与实际使用体验相符。
结论该评价方法可以使评价结果更加全面、准确，可为定性快检产品的合理评价与选择提供参考。

Abstract:
ObjectiveTo establish a scientific and objective evaluation model of the comprehensive performance of immunocolloidal gold qualitative rapid detection kits, and to provide a reference for the overall evaluation of similar products.
MethodsBased on the various factors affecting the performance of qualitative rapid detection kits, a comprehensive performance evaluation index system consisting of 4 first-level indicators and 18 second-level indicators was constructed.The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) method were combined to determine the weights for the evaluation indicators and graded thresholds.The model was then used to evaluate the performance level of 6 brands of furazolidone metabolite rapid test kits.
ResultsAccording to maximum membership degree principle, the evaluation of brand A, B, C, D, E and F were graded as good, excellent, middle, excellent, middle and excellent, respectively.Then the scores of 6 brands were calculated according to the hundred-mark system, and brand B had the highest score.This was consistent with the actual use experience.
ConclusionThe application of this model can make the evaluation results more comprehensive and accurate, providing reference for rational evaluation and selection of qualitative rapid detection kits.

HTML全文

参考文献(16)

施引文献

资源附件(0)