郑毅鸣, 陈健, 张莉萍, 丁一辰, 倪骏, 徐毅. 《上海市建设项目集中空调通风系统卫生学评价规范(试行)》实施效果评价[J]. 上海预防医学, 2021, 33(11): 1076-1079. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2021.19502
引用本文: 郑毅鸣, 陈健, 张莉萍, 丁一辰, 倪骏, 徐毅. 《上海市建设项目集中空调通风系统卫生学评价规范(试行)》实施效果评价[J]. 上海预防医学, 2021, 33(11): 1076-1079. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2021.19502
ZHENG Yi-ming, CHEN Jian, ZHANG Li-ping, DING Yi-chen, NI Jun, XU Yi. Implementation effect of the standard for Hygienic Evaluation of Central Air Conditioning Ventilation Systems in Shanghai Construction Projects Trial)[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2021, 33(11): 1076-1079. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2021.19502
Citation: ZHENG Yi-ming, CHEN Jian, ZHANG Li-ping, DING Yi-chen, NI Jun, XU Yi. Implementation effect of the standard for Hygienic Evaluation of Central Air Conditioning Ventilation Systems in Shanghai Construction Projects Trial)[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2021, 33(11): 1076-1079. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2021.19502

《上海市建设项目集中空调通风系统卫生学评价规范(试行)》实施效果评价

Implementation effect of the standard for Hygienic Evaluation of Central Air Conditioning Ventilation Systems in Shanghai Construction Projects Trial

  • 摘要:
    目的

    方法采用“集中空调通风系统卫生评价报告评分表”,比较《规范》实施前后空调卫生评价报告质量。
    结果《规范》实施后,空调卫生评价报告总分较实施前显著提高(t=3.164,P=0.002);在各项目评分中,格式、总论、工程分析和建议结论的评分均高于实施前(t=3.701、2.012、2.152、2.450,均P<0.05);《规范》实施前后,评价过程的评分差异无统计学意义(P=0.465)。
    结论《规范》实施后,空调卫生评价报告质量显著提高。

     

    Abstract:
    ObjectiveTo evaluate the implementation effect of the "Shanghai Construction Project Centralized Air Conditioning and Ventilation System Hygiene Evaluation Specification (Trial)" (hereinafter referred to as the "standard").
    MethodsThe "Centralized Air Conditioning and Ventilation System Hygiene Evaluation Report Score Sheet" was used to compare the quality of air conditioning hygienic evaluation reports before and after the implementation of the standard.
    ResultsAfter the implementation of the standard, the total score of the air conditioning health evaluation report was significantly higher than that before the implementation (t=3.164, P=0.002). The scores of format, general theory, engineering analysis and suggested conclusion after the implementation were all higher than before the implementation (t=3.701, 2.012, 2.152, 2.450, respectively, all P<0.05). The difference in scores of evaluation process was not statistically significant between before and after the standard implementation (P=0.465).
    ConclusionAfter the implementation of the standard, the quality of air-conditioning health evaluation reports has significantly improved.

     

/

返回文章
返回