上海市杨浦区公共场所“双随机”监管模式效果分析

余颖雅; 肖雅勤; 罗力

doi:10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2021.20475

上海市杨浦区公共场所“双随机”监管模式效果分析

Effects of double random supervision model: a case study of public places in Yangpu District, Shanghai

摘要

摘要:
目的以上海市杨浦区为例，了解公共场所“双随机”监管模式的效果。
方法使用上海市杨浦区2018—2019年公共场所数据，分析2018年和2019年的日常监督与“双随机”监督的不合格率、2018年监督对象在不同监管模式下2019年的处罚情况，用以反映“双随机”监管模式的效果。
结果2018年(χ² = 58.04，P < 0.05)和2019年(χ² = 79.24，P < 0.05)“双随机”监督的不合格率高于当年日常监督的不合格率; 2018年日常监督的次年处罚率(10.74%)与2018年“双随机”监督的次年处罚率(15.65%)之间差异无统计学意义(χ² = 1.81，P = 0.18)。
结论“双随机”监管模式比日常监督更容易发现监督对象的问题，但监管效果仍需巩固。

Abstract:
ObjectiveTo determine the effects of the"double random"supervision model of public places in Yangpu District, Shanghai.
MethodsUsing the"double random"data of public places in Yangpu District of Shanghai from 2018 to 2019, we determined the proportion of unqualified public places assessed by daily supervision and"double random"supervision in 2018 and 2019. Moreover, we identified that if the public places that had been penalized in 2018 would be penalized in 2019, which may reflect the effects of the"double random"supervision model.
ResultsThe proportion of unqualified public places assessed by"double random"supervision was significantly higher than daily supervision in 2018(χ² = 58.04, P < 0.05)and 2019(χ² = 79.24, P < 0.05);however, the proportion of being penalized in the following year between"double random"supervision and daily supervision had no significant difference(χ² = 1.81, P = 0.18).
Conclusion"Double random"supervision may be easier to identify the problems of the supervision subjects than daily supervision; however, it warrants continual efforts to consolidate the regulatory effects.

HTML全文

参考文献(15)

施引文献

资源附件(0)