王卓, 吴静宇. 上海市《生活饮用水水质标准》与国内外水质标准比较及其实施后的影响[J]. 上海预防医学, 2021, 33(10): 960-966. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2021.20605
引用本文: 王卓, 吴静宇. 上海市《生活饮用水水质标准》与国内外水质标准比较及其实施后的影响[J]. 上海预防医学, 2021, 33(10): 960-966. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2021.20605
WANG Zhuo, WU Jing-yu. Comparison of Shanghai water quality standard for drinking water with domestic and foreign standards and its influence after implementation[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2021, 33(10): 960-966. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2021.20605
Citation: WANG Zhuo, WU Jing-yu. Comparison of Shanghai water quality standard for drinking water with domestic and foreign standards and its influence after implementation[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2021, 33(10): 960-966. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2021.20605

上海市《生活饮用水水质标准》与国内外水质标准比较及其实施后的影响

Comparison of Shanghai water quality standard for drinking water with domestic and foreign standards and its influence after implementation

  • 摘要:
    目的探讨上海市《生活饮用水水质标准》(DB31/T 1091—2018)(简称“新地标”)与国内外水质标准的差异,比较新地标实施前后水质的改善情况。
    方法将新地标在指标数量、消毒剂及其副产物指标、新增指标和提标指标与国内外水质标准进行比较,调查上海市浦东新区水厂在地标实施前后的水质关键指标状况。
    结果新地标从国标106项增加至111项,其中常规指标由42项增至49项,非常规指标由64项减至62项;新增常规指标7项,并对17项常规指标限量值进行了提升。对在新地标实施前(2017年)与实施后(2019年)浦东新区全部水厂的水质监测数据分析发现,细菌总数(Z=-2.772,P<0.01)、四氯化碳(Z=-5.570,P<0.01)、三氯甲烷(Z=-5.685,P<0.01)、浑浊度(Z=-4.168,P<0.01)、溶解性总固体(Z=-7.061,P<0.01)、总硬度(Z=-2.338,P<0.05)、耗氧量(Z=-2.580,P<0.05)、阴离子合成洗涤剂(Z=-2.162,P<0.05)、总氯(Z=-2.826,P<0.01),两组之间差异有统计学意义,其余指标差异无统计学意义。
    结论新地标实施参考国内外饮用水标准,趋向高标准严要求,对集中式供水单位供水水质有所提升,但尚需对集中式供水单位开展深度处理工艺改造,以期进一步优化水质。

     

    Abstract:
    ObjectiveTo explore the differences between shanghai water quality standards for drinking water (DB31/T 1091-2018) and domestic and foreign water quality standards, and to compare the improvement of water quality before and after the implementation of DB31/T 1091-2018.
    MethodsTo compare shanghai water quality standard for drinking water with domestic and foreign standards in terms of index number, indicators of disinfectants and their by-products, increased indicators, and revised indicators, and the key water quality indicators before and after the standard implementation in Pudong New Area of Shanghai were investigated.
    ResultsThe number of new standard increased from one hundred and six to one hundred and eleven. Among them, the number of conventional indicators increased from forty-two to forty-nine, while the number of unconventional indicators decreased from sixty-four to sixty-two,seven new conventional indicators were added, and the limit value of seventeen conventional indicators was revised and so on. By analyzing water quality monitoring data of New standard before implementation (2017) and after implementation (2019) at water plants of Pudong New Area of Shanghai , it is found that the total number of bacteria (Z=-2.772,P<0.01), and carbon tetrachloride (Z=-5.570,P<0.01),trichloromethane (Z=-5.685,P<0.01), turbidity (Z=-4.168,P<0.01), total dissolved solids (Z=-7.061,P<0.01), and total hardness (Z=-2.338,P<0.05), oxygen consumption (Z=-2.580,P<0.05), anion synthetic detergent (Z=-2.162,P<0.05), total chlorine (Z=-2.826,P<0.01), there were significant statistical differences between the two groups, while there were no statistical differences between the other indicators.
    ConclusionThe new standard refers to the domestic and foreign drinking water standards, tends to the high and strict requirements, and pushes the improvement water quality of the centralized water supply units, which need to carry out in-depth treatment process transformation, in order to further optimize the water quality.

     

/

返回文章
返回