马欣茹, 王子云, 胡瑾, 杨婷婷, 蒋芝月, 刘丽, 范丽丽, 汪俊华, 刘海燕, 杨敬源. 贵州省典型温泉地区吸烟人群温泉泡浴行为与生存质量的分析[J]. 上海预防医学, 2021, 33(S1): 16-20. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2021.21177
引用本文: 马欣茹, 王子云, 胡瑾, 杨婷婷, 蒋芝月, 刘丽, 范丽丽, 汪俊华, 刘海燕, 杨敬源. 贵州省典型温泉地区吸烟人群温泉泡浴行为与生存质量的分析[J]. 上海预防医学, 2021, 33(S1): 16-20. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2021.21177
MA Xin-ru, WANG Zhi-yun, HU Jin, YANG Ting-ting, JIANG Zhi-yue, LIU Li, FAN Li-li, WANG Jun-hua, LIU Hai-yan, YANG Jing-yuan. Association between hot spring bathing and quality of life of smokers in typical hot spring areas of Guizhou Province[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2021, 33(S1): 16-20. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2021.21177
Citation: MA Xin-ru, WANG Zhi-yun, HU Jin, YANG Ting-ting, JIANG Zhi-yue, LIU Li, FAN Li-li, WANG Jun-hua, LIU Hai-yan, YANG Jing-yuan. Association between hot spring bathing and quality of life of smokers in typical hot spring areas of Guizhou Province[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2021, 33(S1): 16-20. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2021.21177

贵州省典型温泉地区吸烟人群温泉泡浴行为与生存质量的分析

Association between hot spring bathing and quality of life of smokers in typical hot spring areas of Guizhou Province

  • 摘要:
    目的探讨贵州典型温泉地区吸烟人群的温泉泡浴行为与生存质量的关系,为改善吸烟人群的生存质量提出建议。
    方法对贵州省典型温泉地区1 137名吸烟人群进行横断面调查,采用问卷调查的形式收集相关信息。生存质量的评价采用WHO生存质量量表简表,并进行统计学分析。
    结果泡温泉的吸烟人群在心理领域(14.09±1.83 vs 13.79±1.82,P < 0.05)和环境领域的得分(12.70±1.84 vs 12.37±1.67,P < 0.05)显著高于不泡温泉的吸烟人群。多元有序logistic回归分析调整其他因素的结果显示,在生理领域,每月泡温泉次数 < 1次的吸烟人群生存质量得分等级为“好”的可能性是每月泡温泉次数≥1次的吸烟人群的0.70倍(OR=0.70,95%CI:0.54~0.91);在心理领域,从不泡浴的吸烟人群生存质量得分等级为“好”的可能性是每月泡温泉次数≥1次的吸烟人群的0.65倍(OR=0.65,95%CI:0.47~0.90);每月泡温泉次数 < 1次的吸烟人群生存质量得分等级为“好”的可能性是每月泡温泉次数≥1次的吸烟人群的0.71倍(OR=0.71,95%CI:0.54~0.92)。
    结论温泉泡浴与吸烟人群的生存质量之间存在一定联系,泡浴频率越高,其生存质量越高,因此可鼓励吸烟人群经常泡温泉从而帮助其舒缓身体不适,提高生存质量。

     

    Abstract:
    ObjectiveTo analyze the association between hot spring bathing and the quality of life of smokers living in typical hot spring areas of Guizhou to make suggestions on improving their quality of life.
    Methods The study is a cross-sectional study whose data was collected by questionnaires. The WHO Quality of Life Scale(WHO QOL-BREEF)was used to measure quality of life.
    ResultsThe quality of life in the psychological domain(14.09±1.83 vs 13.79±1.82, P < 0.05)and the environmental domain(12.70±1.84 vs 12.37±1.67, P < 0.05)among smokers who took hot spring baths was significantly higher than that among those who did not. After adopting ordinary logistic regression model to adjust for other factors, for the physical domain, the odd of scoring"good"in the WHO scale in group of smokers who took hot spring baths less that once a month was 0.70 lower than that in those who took baths at least once a month(OR=0.70, 95%CI: 0.54-0.91). In psychological domain, the odd of the group of smokers who did not take hot spring baths was 0.65 lower than that in those who took baths at least once a month(OR=0.65, 95%CI: 0.47-0.90). And the odd of the group of smokers who bathed less than once in a month was 0.71 lower than those who bathed at least once a month(OR=0.71, 95%CI: 0.54-0.92).
    ConclusionThere is a positive relationship between hot spring bathing and quality of life, which prompts that people who smoke take hot spring baths to improve their quality of life.

     

/

返回文章
返回