温忆敏, 林元杰, 朱怡平, 金玉娥. 液相色谱-质谱法测定酒中甜蜜素的内标适用探讨[J]. 上海预防医学, 2015, 27(5): 283-287.
引用本文: 温忆敏, 林元杰, 朱怡平, 金玉娥. 液相色谱-质谱法测定酒中甜蜜素的内标适用探讨[J]. 上海预防医学, 2015, 27(5): 283-287.
WEN Yi-min, LIN Yuan-jie, ZHU Yi-ping, JIN Yu-e. Applicability of internal standard in determination of cyclamate in wine by HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2015, 27(5): 283-287.
Citation: WEN Yi-min, LIN Yuan-jie, ZHU Yi-ping, JIN Yu-e. Applicability of internal standard in determination of cyclamate in wine by HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2015, 27(5): 283-287.

液相色谱-质谱法测定酒中甜蜜素的内标适用探讨

Applicability of internal standard in determination of cyclamate in wine by HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry

  • 摘要: 目的探讨液相色谱-质谱联用法测定酒中甜蜜素的内标适用性。方法酒样直接稀释后,采用液相色谱-质谱联用法测定,并分别用外标法和内标法对结果进行定量。结果2种定量方法的结果平均相差11.2%,最大相对相差为16.2%,而外标定量法的结果与国标方法GB/T 5009.97-2003测定的结果一致。结论结果差异源于液质联用的基质效应及其内标化合物选择的不适。

     

    Abstract: Objective To discuss the applicability of internal standard in determination of cyclamate in wine by HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry. Methods After dilution wine sample was determined by HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry and quantified by external and internal standard methods respectively. Results The results by the 2 quantitation methods differed 11.2% in average, and the maximum relative deviation was 16.2%. And the result by external standard quantitation method proved to be consistent with that by the international standard GB/T 5009.97-2003. Conclusion The difference in results is thought to originate from matrix effect in HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry and the improper internal standard compound applied.

     

/

返回文章
返回